A. Field Experience Details: 1. Credit hours: (3) 2. Level/year at which Field Experience is offered: (8th Level, 4th year.). 3. Time allocated for Field Experience activities 15 Weeks ...2... Days 3... Hours 4. Corequisite (or prerequisites if any) to join Field Experience N/A 5. Mode of delivery ? In-person/onsite ? hybrid (onsite/online) ? Online B. Field Experience Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs), Training Activities and Assessment Methods Code Learning Outcomes Aligned PLO Code Training Activities Assessment Methods Assessment Responsibility 1.0 Knowledge and understanding 1.1 List real activities and functions of workplace environment. K1 Various types of Translation, communication skills, modern methods of EFL teaching A wwekly Report on the students’ performance The workplace supervisor and institution’s manger 1.2 Relate theoretical study to the practical reality in the specialty of English language. K3 Various types of Translation, communication skills, modern methods of EFL teaching Field visits to evaluate the achievement of the assigned tasks the supervisor 1.3 Recognize areas for personal growth, future knowledge, and skill development K4 Various types of Translation, communication skills, modern methods of EFL teaching Weekly performance assessment Workplace supervisor evaluation review and assessment with the students 2.0 Skills 2.1 Communicate effectively and appropriately with others and listen to their opinions and discussion. S1 & S3 Listening and speaking skills Peer-assessment The supervisor 2.2 Practice the skill of writing reports. S1 & S5 Writing skill Self-assessment The supervisor 2.3 Apply knowledge and skill learned from previous courses in the workplace. S2 & S4 Student’s presentation at the end of the term. Presentation evaluation. The supervisor 3.0 Values, autonomy, and responsibility 3.1 Demonstrate the ability to work individually and in a team at the workplace. V.1 Various types of Translation, communication skills, modern methods of EFL teaching Peer-assessment The supervisor and the institution manger 3.2 Show confidence in academic and professional communication. V2 Workplace supervisor evaluation of Listening and speaking skills Peer-assessment Workplace supervisor evaluation review and assessment with the student. 3.3 Demonstrate good decision making and time management V2 Various types of Translation Peer-assessment The supervisor and the institution manger *Assessment methods (i.e., practical test, field report, oral test, presentation, group project, essay, etc.). C. Field Experience Administration 1. Field Experience Flowchart for Responsibility Including units, departments, and committees responsible for field experience identifying by the interrelations. The student (trainee) the academic supervisor and the workplace supervisor The program coordinator and the institution manger. 2. Distribution of Responsibilities for Field Experience Activities Activities Department or College Teaching Staff Student Training Organization Field Supervisor Selection of a field experience site ? Selection of supervisory staff ? Provision of the required equipment ? Provision of learning resources ? ? Ensuring the safety of the site ? Commuting to and from the field experience site ? Provision of support and guidance ? ? Implementation of training activities (duties, reports, projects ...) ? ? ? Follow up on student training activities ? ? Monitoring attendance and leave ? Assessment of learning outcomes ? ? Evaluating the quality of field experience ? ? ? Others (specify) The student assessment process. Assessment task (i.e., essay, test, quizzes, group project, examination, speech, oral presentation, etc.) WEEK DUE Proportion of Total Assessment 1 Weekly report submitted by students to the academic supervisor Every week (10 in total) 10% 2 A final report submitted by students Week 11 5 3 Presentation Weeks 12-15 5 4 Punctuality and attendance to the weekly sessions with the academic supervisor. Weeks 1-15 5 5 Academic supervisor's evaluation report Week 15 70% 6 Attending training sessions at the beginning of the course. Week 1 5 7 Total 15 weeks 100% 3. Field Experience Location Requirements Suggested Field Experience Locations General Requirements* Special Requirements** Translation departments in the Governmental/private institutions Computers, Internet, online/offline dictionaries English/Arabic documents Governmental/private schools Classrooms, data show, learning sources N/A Hotels and tourist sites N/A English-speaking guests and tourists *E.g. provides information technology, equipment, laboratories, halls, housing, learning sources, clinics … etc. ** E.g. Criteria of the institution offering the training or those related to the specialization, such as safety standards, dealing with patients in medical specialties … etc. 4. Decision-Making Procedures for Identifying Appropriate Locations for Field Experience The department of Languages and Translation sends formal letters to appropriate locations for field experience asking for allowing students to receive traing. After getting acceptance, the head of the department puts the topic on the department council agenda to get approval. 5. Safety and Risk Management Potential Risks Safety Actions Risk Management Procedures FIRE As determined by the field training location management Following the safety procedures of field training locations Building collapse As determined by the field training location management Following the safety procedures of field training locations D. Training Quality Evaluation Evaluation Areas/Issues Evaluators Evaluation Methods Effectiveness of teaching Students Indirect (surveys & reports) Effectiveness of Students assessment Faculty Direct (follow-up and supervision) Quality of learning resources Students & Faculty Indirect (surveys & reports) The extent to which CLOs have been achieved Faculty, Program Leader & students Direct (follow-up and supervision) & Indirect (surveys & reports) Other N/A N/A Effectiveness of teaching Students Indirect Evaluation areas (e.g., Effectiveness of Training and assessment, Extent of achievement of course learning outcomes, Quality of learning resources, etc.) Evaluators (Students, Supervisory Staff, Program Leaders, Peer Reviewer, Others (specify) Assessment Methods (Direct, Indirect)